Member Login

WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE

  • THE ALLIANCE
    • ABOUT
    • CONNECT
    • NEWSROOM
    • SOURCE ROCK BLOG
  • GET INVOLVED
    • EVENTS
    • MEMBER BENEFITS
    • MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION
    • POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
  • ADVOCACY
    • REGULATORY
    • PUBLIC LANDS >
      • GREAT AMERICAN OUTDOORS ACT
      • VOICES AGAINST THE BIDEN BAN
    • WILDLIFE
    • LEGAL
    • MARKET ACCESS
  • MEMBERS
    • Member Portal
    • Get Connected
  • THE ALLIANCE
    • ABOUT
    • CONNECT
    • NEWSROOM
    • SOURCE ROCK BLOG
  • GET INVOLVED
    • EVENTS
    • MEMBER BENEFITS
    • MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION
    • POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
  • ADVOCACY
    • REGULATORY
    • PUBLIC LANDS >
      • GREAT AMERICAN OUTDOORS ACT
      • VOICES AGAINST THE BIDEN BAN
    • WILDLIFE
    • LEGAL
    • MARKET ACCESS
  • MEMBERS
    • Member Portal
    • Get Connected

SOURCE ROCK BLOG

SEC Climate Disclosure Rule Advances Europe’s Agenda, Not America’s (Part 1)

6/17/2022

 
​The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) claims its controversial climate disclosure rule is justified because demand is purportedly growing for standardized climate information among credible, non-partisan financial institutions and asset managers. Yet reality is quite different.
 
Analysis conducted by Western Energy Alliance reveals what SEC is not sharing: the proposed rule relies on the work of a global network of activist organizations—not a majority of American investors or institutions—that have been collaborating for several years to end the use of oil and natural gas around the world. In the course of developing our comments on the rule, we found that SEC is defending the rule based on the demands of mostly foreign investors with only a very small minority of American investment managers. 
Picture
WHITE PAPER
The following is the first part of a series of posts and is based on a white paper that provides more detail.
 
Under the section header “The Growing Investor Demand for Climate-Related Risk Disclosure and Related Information” within the proposed rule, SEC begins to build the case by citing a long discussion of organizations and the various international initiatives, citing to the:
 
  • United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) has 4,000 signatories with $120 trillion in assets
  • Global Investor Statement to Governments on Climate Change signed by 630 investors with $37 trillion in assets
  • Investor Agenda’s 2021 Global Investor Statement to Governments on the Climate Crisis, signed by 733 global institutional investors with $52 trillion in assets
  • Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative of 128 signatories and $43 trillion in assets
  • Climate Action 100+ comprised of 617 investors managing $60 trillion in assets
  • Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero with 450 financial institutions managing $130 trillion in assets.
 
The list and assets under management appear very compelling, if not overwhelming. However, SEC has failed to provide context. How many investors are represented multiple times in the laundry list, signing onto multiple of these initiatives? Perhaps those investors are promiscuous joiners, signing onto multiple of these initiatives. Indeed, in Footnote 56 of the rule SEC acknowledges, “There is some overlap in the signatories to the listed initiatives.” It is not clear what the overlap is in terms of both number of investors and total assets managed, but perhaps that obfuscation is intended.
 
Digging deeper into the numbers SEC cites, there are seven main climate change non-profit advocacy organizations behind them:
 
  • Asia Investor Group on Climate Change (AIGCC)
  • Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)
  • Ceres
  • Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC)
  • Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC)
  • United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI)
  • United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP).
 
An examination of how these groups are interrelated further calls into question any broad consensus for climate disclosure. The multiple international groups cited by SEC are not operating independently from each other, but rather are working in close collaboration. The following chart shows that, across the board, each initiative is comprised of the same small group of members. There is very little to differentiate the Global Investor Statement from the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative or from any of the others. These groups are so intertwined that it is not at all clear they represent anything other than a minority of investors advancing a particular policy agenda.
Intertwined Network of Climate Initiatives Cited by SEC and Non-Profit Advocacy Group
Picture
However intertwined these groups and initiatives are, a more fundamentally fatal flaw in the use of their work by SEC is the fact that the vast majority of investors they represent are foreign. Across those seven climate initiatives and the global network of non-profit organizations that support them, only 19% are American. More than half are European.
Asset Management Companies Supporting Climate Activis
Picture
Western Energy Alliance analyzed data on the 6,991 companies included in these initiatives, For the 5,800 companies that provide country-of-origin locations, a more than representative sample, only 1,124 are American.
 
Foreign companies do not set United States policy. SEC is skating on very thin ice when it uses foreign companies organized into initiatives by seven climate change activist organizations to justify a regulation that would impose a $10.235 billion cost on American society.
 
Further diving into the numbers, the 1,124 American asset management companies participating in the climate change disclosure advocacy that these seven groups are orchestrating represent a mere 7% of the 16,127 registered investment companies in the United States. Therefore, SEC’s implied “consensus” of investment companies clamoring for disclosure falls apart at just 7%. That is pretty thin ice for a rule with such wide-ranging implications.
 
It's concerning that the SEC is justifying this proposed rule by citing to these global climate initiatives. SEC wants the public to focus on the trillions of dollars and thousands of asset managers these initiatives represent around the world. Yet, the agency is overlooking the fact that these groups vastly represent foreign interests and a global network of activists, not a majority of American investors.
 
More details on this topic and several other shortcomings of SEC’s climate disclosure rule are available in our white paper.

​This is the first in a series of posts on SEC's climate disclosure rule. Read the next post here.

Picture

Author

Aaron Johnson, Vice President of Public Affairs

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

​Sitemap   |  Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | ©2020 Western Energy Alliance
1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 2175
​
Denver, CO 80264
​(303) 623-0987
Picture